Price Of Car Tax :-((
#1
Posted 08 September 2010 - 04:54 PM
#2
Posted 08 September 2010 - 05:56 PM
#3
Posted 08 September 2010 - 08:18 PM
#4
Posted 08 September 2010 - 08:30 PM
#5
Posted 08 September 2010 - 09:11 PM
#6
Posted 08 September 2010 - 09:34 PM
paul1393, on 08 September 2010 - 08:18 PM, said:
#7
Posted 09 September 2010 - 06:06 PM
The problem now is that the being left in such a financial mess would mean any tax cuts (which is traditionally high up on the agenda) have to wait unless bigger savings could be made as a result of the cut. Take the speed cameras for example, the way they were run was the standard new labour quango setup. Most people did seem to beleive they pay for themselves in the way of fines but they had 'safety camera partnerships' which absorbed all the money instead of returning it to central government, so with the exception of some income tax from the non GDP contributing jobs in these partnerships, the whole enterprise had to be paid for by taxpayers, hence why the cameras are now being dropped, so local councils down have to fork out for them. I'm pretty sure most people are in favor of this, although to my surprise the AA have been moaning on the news, so I will certainly never sign up with them again!
The Tories did promise an end to the war on motorists, classic car tax will be considered at some point but I know for certain it won't be anytime soon. I'd like to know what'll happen to fuel prices, I hope they'll be a cut in the fuel duty when the VAT increase comes in to counter it for private motorists, but the emphasis is for the British transport industry who will save on fuel costs in this case, and it's about time.
#8
Posted 09 September 2010 - 07:21 PM
#9
Posted 10 September 2010 - 02:36 PM
#10
Posted 10 September 2010 - 02:43 PM
Rick-Manta, on 10 September 2010 - 02:36 PM, said:
Good start, I am liking this list. So to add, we need free car tax for cars over 20 years old, petrol prices reduced to £0.50p a litre, a ban on caravans and JCB's on dual carriageways, and roadworks only to be done at night at weekends!! Whats the chances??
#11
Posted 10 September 2010 - 03:59 PM
smiffy220, on 10 September 2010 - 02:43 PM, said:
Too good to be true. Its good to dream though. Gives you something to live for lol
#12
Posted 10 September 2010 - 05:23 PM
I currently have two classic cars, my 1972 Sunbeam Alpine Fastback & my 1980 Cavalier Sportshatch that would save me £105 PA
I think this proposal could work although i'm sure some owners of pre 1973 cars would object.
Edited by Rapierdave, 10 September 2010 - 05:24 PM.
#13
Posted 10 September 2010 - 05:28 PM
That however does not excuse the robbing threatening thieving gits that give the genuine service providers a bad name.
Going back to Raod Tax....
Could not belive the other year when the talk was about "Taxing people for the distance they drive
Would have used the correct language in that post, but got warned by the mods on too many an occaision that a 8 year old might be reading this forum, well ther you go 8 year old Manta owners, this is the Opel Manta Owners Club website isn't it...........????
Right back off me soap box now...
#14
Posted 10 September 2010 - 07:43 PM
And if it's your second car......... well you can afford to have a car lying around insured then you can afford to tax it........
In fact the green party say if a cars life is doubled from 10 years on average to 20 then your carbon foot print goes down by 40%
So get out your spreadsheets and see that if you don't have several thousand pounds of daily drive car depreciating that you can easily offset a Mantas petrol and be pounds head running it and help the environment, especially if you fit a modern engine.
opel2000, on 10 September 2010 - 05:28 PM, said:
Going back to Raod Tax....
Could not belive the other year when the talk was about "Taxing people for the distance they drive
100% agree here......... and they were talking about taxing cars that use a lot of fuel more per mile........... erm already are as use more fuel.
Don't get me wrong not in favour of high fuel prices, but if we must be taxed per mile PLEASE add it to fuel. I have no desire to pay salaries, building costs, administration costs etc for any such new system. Therefore adding it to fuel would work out better for us.
Oh and here's the final good point.......... any such systems reosurces, buildings, staff, systems etc............... BIG CARBON FOOTPRINT so how would that save the world?????
#15
Posted 10 September 2010 - 08:21 PM
#16
Posted 11 September 2010 - 11:34 AM
mantadoc, on 10 September 2010 - 07:43 PM, said:
Oh and here's the final good point.......... any such systems reosurces, buildings, staff, systems etc............... BIG CARBON FOOTPRINT so how would that save the world?????
The green party may have a point on trying to double car lifespans, but this wont do our economy much good and as for environmental, apart from waste management, what real harm that we can see is it doing? One of their many frightening policies was the introduction of a 20mph speed limit in any built up area and a 55mph national maximun speed limit. I've also heard Caroline Lucas (the only Green party MP) in interview and I think the intention was to make 'normal people' not think they weren't completely mad and came up with the idea of having mileage vouchers limiting people to how far they can travel, now I'm fairly sure whether you're a borderline commie or a raving tory like myself, in a free counrty you'd have to think the greens certifiable!
#17
Posted 11 September 2010 - 12:02 PM
Rick-Manta, on 11 September 2010 - 11:34 AM, said:
Ah but here's the good bit...... It doesn't matter whether you believe in the "carbon malarky" or not.
What matters is that the people intending to tax you by any such system either a) do believe or b) merely use that argument and therefore as such cannot dismiss any argument against any such system based on it's carbon foot print out of hand. Basically they hand you the defense against implementing it as a separate system on a plate.
#18
Posted 11 September 2010 - 01:21 PM
Here's something I found from one of the MG circles, sent to the Conservative party central office from one of the classic car magazines. Although it was written just before the election. I've heard that it is definately still in consideration, there are no figures relating to how much of an impact classic car tax excemption really makes, but it is predicted the figure is a drop in the ocean in relation to total road fund duty.
What is the Conservative Party's policy on Historic/Classic vehicles? Gordon Brown in his early days as a 'stealth tax' chancellor froze the rolling 25 year exempton for these vehicles from the date of 31/12/1972. Will the Conservative party reinstate this exemption to help preserve the Classic British vehicles?
I am writing on behalf of David Cameron to thank you for your email about the tax exemption for vintage vehicles.
We believe that it is of genuine importance to our country’s culture and history to preserve our classic car heritage, and we would like to acknowledge the dedication of members of historic car clubs, car owners and enthusiasts. We understand that interest in classic cars is worth £1.6 billion to the UK economy and results in the employment of around 25,000 people. As you may be aware, it was the last Conservative Government which introduced a nil Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) rate for cars over 25 years old, with a “rolling exemption” provision. It was in Gordon Brown’s 1998 Budget that the Government terminated the “roll-over” provisions without any announcement or consultation. Robert Goodwill MP, the Shadow Roads Minister is developing a Roads Green Paper in which he is looking at a broad range of issues relating Britain’s roads. I know that the road tax of historic vehicles is on his agenda, and I will make sure that he is aware of your views.
Thank you, once again, for writing.
Edited by Rick-Manta, 11 September 2010 - 01:41 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













